Abstract
Introduction The prognosis of patients with very high-risk hematologic malignancies who have relapsed/refractory diseases or carrying very poor-risk gene mutations were dismal even after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Donor lymphocyte infusion (DLI) is a promising prophylactic strategy for reducing relapse after transplant. However, DLI-associated graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were still concerned, especially after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (allo-PBSCT). Therefore, prophylactic DLI should be safe with tolerable DLI-associated GVHD and NRM except for its anti-leukemia effect. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of prophylactic DLI for the very high-risk hematologic malignancies after allo-PBSCT, we performed a cohort study in 160 consecutive patients with hematological malignancies who received unmanipulated allo-PBSCT. DLI procedure was modified to use G-CSF mobilized peripheral progenitors instead of steady state lymphocytes and 4 to 6 weeks of immunosuppressant for prevention of DLI-associated GVHD. The outcomes of those very high-risk patients (group A: DLI group; group B: non-DLI group) and the patients without the very high-risk features (group C) who were not planned for prophylactic DLI were compared.
Patients and Methods The underlying diseases consist of acute myeloid leukemia (n = 78), myelodysplastic syndrome (n = 22), acute lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma (n = 45), chronic myeloid leukemia (n = 7), non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 7), and plasma cell leukemia (n = 1). Sixty five patients (41.2%) received allo-PBSCT from HLA-matched sibling donors, 7 patients (4.4%) from matched unrelated donors, and 87 patients (54.4%) from haploidentical donors (Table 1). The very high-risk features were defined as 1) disease in non-remission state at time of transplant; 2) acute leukemia achieving complete remission (CR1) with 3 or more cycles of induction chemotherapy; 3) leukemia in CR1/CR2 carrying TP53, TET2 or DNMT3A gene mutation. Patients in CR with FLT3/ITD or BCR/ABL T315I gene mutation were enrolled due to the unavailability of effective targeted drugs. Prophylactic modified DLI was planned at 30 to 60 days post-transplant for all very high-risk patients with the absence of GVHD. The infusion was G-CSF mobilized peripheral progenitors from cryopreserved cell aliquots of the original graft. The trough concentration of CSA was maintained at 180 to 250 ng/mL for at least 4 to 6 weeks post-DLI and then discontinued within 2 weeks when no GVHD occurred. All the patients were followed-up for a median of 11.1 (0.5 - 29.7) months after transplant.
Results Prophylactic DLI was administered for 29 very high-risk patients (group A) at a median of 63 (25 - 176) days after transplant. The median numbers of mononuclear cells and CD3+ lymphocytes infused were 0.7 (0.1 - 1.4) × 108/kg and 18.5 (5.4 - 69.2) × 106/kg with a single dose. Nineteen patients (39.6%) with very high-risk features did not receive prophylactic DLI (group B) for the reasons of early relapse (n = 8), occurrence of GVHD (n = 8), and uncontrolled infections (n = 3). The cumulative incidence (CI) of grade II-IV acute GVHD at day 100 after transplant was 33.2% in group A, 38.0% in group B (p= 0.318), and 28.2% in group C (p= 0.746). The 2-year CI of chronic GVHD was 29.9% in group A, 15.8% in group B (p= 0.428), and 54.6% in group C (p= 0.255). The 2-year CI of relapse was 54.6% in group A, which was significantly lower than that in group B (68.4%, p= 0.019). The relapse-free survival in group A was superior to that in group B (37.3% vs . 24.6%, p = 0.032). In the very high-risk group of patients (group A and B), prophylactic DLI was correlated with a lower risk of relapse (p= 0.043, hazard ratio = 0.45). The 2-year CI of NRM in group A was not significantly different from that in group B (22.4% vs . 15.8%, p= 0.461) or group C (22.4% vs . 23.2%, p= 0.949). In addition, there was no significant difference in overall survival between group A and group B (48.6% vs . 35.1%, p = 0.134). The 6-month CI of CMV/EBV reactivations in group A was not significantly different from that in group B (p= 0.107 and p= 0.668) or group C (p= 0.130 and p= 0.596).
Conclusions This study showed that the prophylactic DLI after unmanipulated allo-PBSCT was well tolerated and effective for the patients with very high-risk hematologic malignancies in decreasing relapse without increasing the risks of GVHD and NRM.
No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal